Using official Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Economic Estimates, this Discussion Paper examines the distribution and growth of the Creative Industries in the UK at the regional level.
The analysis shows the extent to which London and, to a lesser extent, the South East dominate the creative industries in the UK. Not only are the creative industries larger in London and the South East, they have also been growing faster in these regions than in the rest of the UK.
Furthermore, London and the South East dominate economic output from the creative industries considerably more than they dominate employment in these industries. This implies that labour productivity in the creative industries is substantially higher in London and, to a lesser extent, the South East than in the rest of the UK. Indeed, in some sub-sectors and regions the implied labour productivity of creative industry workers is strikingly low.
The government is committed to ‘narrowing the gap’ between the London and the South East, both in relation to the creative industries and the economy as a whole. The policy challenge can be summarised as how to maintain growth in London and the South East while ensuring the rest of the country catches up. This implies that the creative industries need to grow faster in the rest of the UK than in London and the South East and, to be meaningful, ‘catching up’ means not only narrowing the gap in terms of employment, but also in terms of productivity.
The paper discusses the scale of this policy challenge. It demonstrates that if the rest of the UK is to catch up with London and the South East in terms of employment in the creative industries then employment in these industries in the rest of the UK would have to grow at five times its current rate for the next twenty years. And furthermore for convergence in productivity to occur, labour productivity growth would have to increase very substantially and remain very high for twenty years.
While such convergence is not impossible, it will require substantial and long term commitments. While welcome, the paper is doubtful that the current approach based on “creative clusters” will be up to the task.
Read more in the blogfrom Professor Bruce Tether, Research Director of the PEC and author of the research.